Pavelski turned pro after two seasons with the Badgers and established himself as someone worthy of two Olympic assignments, including a silver medal in 2010, as well as 476 goals in 1,332 NHL games.
In all, Pavelski played 18 seasons in the NHL and emerged as one of the most impactful American players in history. He scored 74 goals in the Stanley Cup playoffs, the most by a U.S. player.
Adam Burish, the UW captain in 2004 and ’05, described Pavelski’s unique approach to the game.
“I don’t remember a guy that I ever played with that was as happy and excited to be at the rink every day,” Burish said of Pavelski. “That was contagious. It pushed me. It pushed other guys because you’d see him at practice either before, after or during working on something and you’d look over and think, ‘What is he doing?’ Well, he missed a shot from that spot yesterday and so he’s got 100 pucks lined up right there and he’s working on that shot.’ Or he’s tipping pucks in front of the net because he missed a tip-in on his backhand. So, he has coach shoot pucks on his backhand so he can tip that in the next time.”
It’s that kind of passion, work ethic and attention to detail that has led Pavelski to the UW Athletic Hall of Fame.
“It’s something you never think about as you’re going along,” Pavelski said. “It’s not your goal. It’s kind of your whole body of work that comes together at the end. I’m definitely proud of it knowing that each and every day you tried to keep building towards that next level and building yourself individually.
“It’s a huge compliment to just look back and the success and the efforts you put in. It’s an awesome honor with everyone that’s come through and the athletes that keep coming through.”
Mike Eaves, the Wisconsin coach from 2002 to 2016, said Pavelski always played to his strengths.
“It’s fun to look at different athletes and the package they bring to the table with them,” Eaves said. “You think about Joe Pavelski. He was labeled as not overly big, not overly fast, good shot, good hands, good IQ. But you know the thing that Joe did best was play to his strengths. He would continue to work on his weaknesses – we didn’t call them weaknesses; we called them “areas of improvement” – and he would get better at those areas. But he always played to his strengths. That’s what he built his game on.”